“We Should Not Have This In Common”
Actually, “THIS” has become so common, that we have become
inured to the slow walk to nothing in response.
Santa Fe, Texas.
Number 45 promises that this will and must stop, but other
than finding a moment to make it all about himself (remember Parkland: “I think
I would have run in there and stopped the shooter, really, I do.”) : he’ll do
nothing.
Sound cynical? Read
the messages from David Hogg and others from Parkland. They’ve suffered and know already the cold reluctance
of those in the thrall of the NRA to assist them or all of us in any way. At my age, cynicism might be expected with
the pains of aging. At their young ages, living
in our current America is just as debilitating for their souls. God bless them for the fight.
“Prepare
to watch the NRA boast about getting higher donations,” one Parkland student, Cameron Kasky, said on
Twitter. “Prepare to see students rise up and be called ‘civil terrorists’ and crisis actors. Prepare
for the right-wing media to attack the survivors.”
Usually after the mass shootings – Sandy Hook, Aurora, Las
Vegas, Parkland – data indicates a quick jump in gun sales, but surprisingly
that expected increase seems to be dropping off recently.
It’s noticeable because “recently” can be tracked quickly
from data and numbers of background checks and purchases of weapons (especially
long guns) with the many mass shootings we have in 2018.
After Sandy Hook, the terrifying image of a deranged child killing children with an AR15 and a sensible President disconnected from the political bridle of the NRA caused a tidal wave of anxious gun-wanters to purchase weapons they figured would rightfully be blocked from sales. Later with a new occupant in the White House, reactions to shootings no longer presents a fear of any ban whatsoever: not on bump stocks, not on refusing purchases for the mentally ill, not on age limits.
After Sandy Hook, the terrifying image of a deranged child killing children with an AR15 and a sensible President disconnected from the political bridle of the NRA caused a tidal wave of anxious gun-wanters to purchase weapons they figured would rightfully be blocked from sales. Later with a new occupant in the White House, reactions to shootings no longer presents a fear of any ban whatsoever: not on bump stocks, not on refusing purchases for the mentally ill, not on age limits.
“We're
only 20 weeks into 2018, and there have already been 22 school
shootings where someone was hurt or killed. That averages out to more than 1
shooting a week.” https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/02/us/school-shootings-2018-list-trnd/index.html
After
the Parkland shooting, background checks for long guns like AR-15’s leaped up
12.6%. I know that sounds amazing, but
it’s way down from earlier numbers – when Obama was President. After Sandy Hook, for example, the percentage
increase for long gun purchases (again, assault weapons) was over 50%. Now with Donald Trump in the Oval Office, the
fear of political or legal response to any mass shootings by those who want
their long guns has noticeably decreased.
Quite
opposite this national right-wing relaxation of fear and paranoia, local gun
manufacturers in Illinois like Springfield Armory are going to the mat with a Democratically controlled
General Assembly and their partner in Bruce Vincent Rauner. The last messages sent out by the Geneseo
based company demand everyone prepare to fight any attempt to override the
Governor’s veto of a bill to demand Illinois gun retailers to become
licensed.
In
addition, Springfield Armory wanted everyone to stop the following bills: (HB1467)
banning bump stocks, etc., (HB1469) banning high capacity magazines, (HB1664)
Hotlines for people to call in individuals who are demonstrating clear and
dangerous behaviors who have guns, (HB1465) raising the age for gun purchases
to 21. But you can also get a special
deal on the new “Saint” from Springfield Armory if you hurry:
And
so, we stumble along as a nation playing this pattern of horror è surprise è thoughts and prayers è blame of mentally ill,
students themselves, number of doors in a school è START OVER.
BUT
I JUST WANT A GUN…FOR PROTECTION?
Scientific
American produced a careful exegesis/study of what guns specifically do in our
country and how such weapons alter our lives.
It’s a very worthy and sobering read.
Since
Wayne LaPierre and Grover Norquist and the K Street lobbyists have fallen like
a hard rain on Washington’s willing swamp-dwellers, the numbers of Gun related
deaths from increased ownership of guns have not changed in many ways – EXCEPT
ONE.
Police
interventions have by and large remained the same. Accidental shootings have remained stable or
decreasing. Homicides have shown nothing
significant in any increase, altho0ugh data used by Scientific American does
not include this last year when we have been under the weight of 24 hour news
reporting.
The
difference is suicides. In 2014,
according to Scientific American, nearly two-thirds of gun deaths occurring in
the United States were suicides: 21,334 people. A jump of nearly 5000 people.
Bring
a gun into the house, and you have changed the possible outcomes of your own or
another’s life’s end in significant manner. How?
You’ll never quite know, except that statistically, when you’re having
that down moment, or that feeling of despair, there’s an ultimate outcome in a
box next to your bed or on the shelf above your sweaters.
“Several
studies now confirm that suicide is often a decision made suddenly. If the
moment somehow passes safely, the evidence suggests, lives can be saved in the
short and long term.
“There's
a fair amount of research showing that the suicide crisis is time-limited,”
says John Mann, a professor of translational neuroscience at Columbia
University who studies suicide. Two thirds of those who survived a suicide
attempt, according to one 1991 study, had started planning their course of
action less than an hour beforehand. Another study notes that almost half of
the 82 people who attempted suicide said they had started thinking about their
current attempt less than 10 minutes earlier. Moreover, in the case of guns
especially, an investigation by the New Hampshire medical examiner's office
showed that nearly one in 10 suicides by firearm from 2007 to 2009 involved a
weapon that was purchased or rented the preceding week—often within just a few
hours.” https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-plan-to-prevent-gun-suicides/
The
danger to yourself from yourself or your family, therefore, is magnified once
you purchase a weapon; more terribly, it is confirmed when you provide such
agents of death for your children – returning their arms to them after
confiscation, leaving them free to take and use, allowing them to purchase or
hold them even as you know the mental angst of someone who needs
intervention. These are other issues
facing the person who might jump at securing their Second Amendment right after
Santa Fe…or the next catastrophe.
Please
consider what the NRA will never tell you.
Not just cheering on these kids or saying good for these kids, but acknowledging that these kids are LITERALLY fighting for their lives. WHAT are their parents doing having guns in the house? Surely, the Waffle House shooter's father MUST be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law; like Adam Lasker's (sp.-? I have conveniently put his last name out of my mind; it is the victims & their families who need to be remembered)mother (although she suffered the ultimate punishment, having died at the hand of the son to whom she had provided the gun). &, BTW, where was HIS father? (All this constant whining & moaning about absent fathers in Black families being the case for shootings, but not once have I seen/heard a Caucasian father{esp. in the case of the Waffle House shooter}being held responsible for multiple killings...& for actually providing the shooter's weapon).
ReplyDeleteWhat can we do? Elections are coming up--vote out EVERY legislator who takes NRA money. Every.single.one. & no new ones elected who have taken NRA money. Or ALEC money (or belong to ALEC, because they are bought). Or Koch money.