Conversation: Union leadership, membership and communication in
Illinois and Public Sector Unions
Dear Fred, John, and Glen,
Mr. Rogers gave valuable adult
lessons to children, parents, teachers, and all of us.
“I like to be told
If it’s going to hurt,
If
it’s going to be hard,
If it’s
not going to hurt.
I like to be
told. I like to be told.”
…Active and retired teachers
in Illinois and across the nation are besieged with attacks on basic teacher
rights, salaries, working conditions, evaluations based on the scores of
classes they never taught and students they never had in class, pillaging earned
compensation (present and future pensions), and much more.
The technical ability to mass
communicate today has never been better or easier. Are teachers being told what
they need to know by their own leadership?
Illinois and Chicago have two
separate teachers’ union leaderships. Chicago has the Chicago Teachers Union
led by Karen Lewis. Illinois has the Illinois Education Association led by
Cinda Klickna…
With SBI in court, which cuts
earned income for retired teachers while continuing to mandate that teachers
pay 9.4% and more into a system which is intentionally robbed (underfunded) as
a quasi-legalized form of wage theft, Klickna and IEA send automatic updates of
member discount coupons for Men’s Wearhouse, Brooks Brothers, Worldwide Golf
Shops, IZOD, Under Armour, Texas de Brazil Steakhouse, etc…
Lewis and CTU regularly appear
at every venue that gives an opportunity to update members with the truth –
good news or bad news. Lewis calls for a fair tax on stocks and futures
transactions to pay what is legally owed to the pillaged teacher pension
systems. “We don’t have a pension crisis, we have a pension shortfall and a
crisis in [legislative/political] leadership.” View and read HERE.
How the producers of the
reality TV show Chicagoland attempted to intimidate her into being part of the
series. View and read HERE.
The racial and political abuses presented in raw power Chicago politics. HERE.
The CTU opposition to Common
Core, why Rahm Emanuel and an appointed group of multimillionaires and
billionaires who invest and profit from charter schools should not be Chicago’s
School Board, what Emanuel’s re-election destroy in public education (HERE)
and much more.
The most recent episode of
Klickna and IEA taking actions and keeping members updated was the fiasco of
endorsing ($50,000) the recent IL Chair of ALEC Kirk Dillard (R) as a
“pro-public education, friend of teachers” gubernatorial candidate even as he
spoke to right-wing groups about closing schools, firing teachers, and stealing
teacher pensions. Read HERE.
Because IEA leadership has not
searched for or created a candidate within the last few decades who is
pro-public education, members are fed this political insanity as the old
lesser-of-two-evils routine rather than as an example of a lack of effective
union leadership. Leadership with long term progressive building skills.
Even worse, IEA/NEA teachers
are now being given silence or updates consisting of store coupons for Men’s
Wearhouse and other stuff. This is insulting on more levels than can be
expressed in a single blog.
This is NOT an anti-union
diatribe. This a demand for real leadership in Illinois. WE NEED TO BE TOLD THE
TRUTH IN A TIMELY MANNER.
- Ken Previti
Dear
Ken,
You
have hit on a topic that is guaranteed to get my blood flowing. From my
earliest days as a union member and union activist I have fought for the idea
that a democratic organization requires that the members have access to information.
I guess that is why we became bloggers.
I
recall an IEA Representative Assembly a few years back when I and other members
proposed establishing an internet-based system that would allow local members
to contact each other for the purpose of political action and lobbying.
The
leadership put the kibosh on that faster than you could say Ken Swanson. You
know how that works, Ken. When the leadership wants a proposal to die, they put
a price tag on the proposal that is so high that the delegates’ only response
is to vote it down. However, the leadership’s real purpose is controlling the
message.
Member
to member contact without going through Government Relations? No way. To me,
the issue of the free flow of information and communication between the leadership
and the rank-rank-file is but a single part of making our union more democratic
and more powerful.
Milwaukee
teacher union President Bob Peterson writes in his essay, “A New Teacher
Union Movement Rising”: “We promote an organizing model with
a strong dose of internal union democracy and increased member participation.
This contrasts to a business model that views union membership as an insurance
policy where decision-making is concentrated in a small group of elected
leaders and/or paid staff.”
This
is the choice facing active and retired members of the IEA. Do we stay with the
old business model? Or do the threats we now face demand an organizing model
with internal democracy and the free flow of information?
I
don’t think that the old model – which is the IEA’s current model – will get us
through the next period.
Do
you?
-
Fred
Dear Ken, Fred, and Glen:
Received your ideas and
concerns about union communication and leadership and found myself wondering
what the last brontosaurus mused while munching swamp grass a hundred and forty
million years ago.
Of course, Ken, your polemic
against the offers of shirts and linens through the IEA internet contact was
amusing, and I always did have an appreciation for the calming influence of Mr.
Rogers, but the message was pretty clearly non-political, only a membership
offer for consumers prior to a holiday. In fact, it included a click point to
refuse receipt of further consumer materials from IEA. Just click it, Ken.
On the other hand, your and
Fred’s concerns certainly mirror my own unsettling thoughts about what is
coming and if we (IEA, IFT, and others) are quite prepared.
Like Wisconsin, we too could
be looking at a sea change in leadership very shortly, a continuing fiscal
crisis certainly, and a dubious outcome in the court battle over our benefits
from pensions we worked for and deserve.
Except for the last item, it
appears that neither IEA nor IFT have anticipated any of these issues, and
Fred’s reference to the need for a new model is certainly fitting; but if we
are to become a leaner and certainly meaner machine like Karen Lewis’ CTU, we’d
better start creating and promoting a different kind of active IEA member. I
hear ennui and exasperation from actives, not anger – at least in the suburban
areas. That would need some serious adjustment. And we’d (retirees too) all
better be prepared to do a lot more politically and educationally than we ever
have before.
Union membership is less than
it was in 1915 now. And our numbers are sinking about as quickly as the
Lusitania. Furthermore, recent drops in public union memberships in Wisconsin
and Indiana tell a very dismal tale of what happens when a Rauner-like
character gets in the governor’s door. Have you seen any mobilization to stop
that?
I remember a year ago, Will
Lovett remarked to a group of retired IEA members that the “very atmosphere”
had changed in Springfield; everything had transformed. This was more than just
preparing us for SB2404; it was a truism about how a disappearing power is
treated, and the legislators can feel union power and influence fading away.
Will the old top-down model
survive what’s continually coming, asks Fred?
Not a chance.
- John
Dear
Ken, Fred, and John:
“Are teachers being told what they need to know by their own
leadership?”
Generally
speaking, a union leadership will never reveal the inner workings of its
clandestine decision-making process to its membership; nor should it. What
cabal will share its secrets anyway, except when it might be deemed necessary
to create an illusion of powerful self-restraint and intelligence to mask
incompetence or diffidence? Furthermore, keeping union members in metaphoric
“darkness” until leadership decides to tell them what they need to know and
when to act maintains mystery and power.
Conversely,
it is prudent for the IEA not to reveal the significant details of the current
so-called “pension reform” litigation, and perhaps it is better for most
members not “to be told if it’s going to hurt” since many retired and harried
IEA members seem to prefer a leadership that allows them to live life without
more trepidation.
Although
it is often said that “ignorance is bliss,” history reveals quite consistently
that what we do not know can “hurt” us, nonetheless. Perhaps this is why some
retired and active members of the IEA demand meaningful communication from
their leadership.
We
can expect Illinois General Assemblies will continue their assaults on our
constitutional contract. Senate Bill 1 and several antedated court cases prove
chronic attempts at theft. Thus, we need a dynamic leadership with the
determination to inspire and to listen to its politically-informed members when
fighting against the next assaults upon constitutional rights and benefits and
public school teachers.
This
necessitates a current leadership that does not readily condemn differences of
opinion from those who might question and challenge the IEA leadership
regarding the significant issues confronting all of us. This unfortunate
situation has been exacerbated by two IEA ex-presidents who have labeled any
disagreements as blatant disloyalties.
As
stated by John Stuart Mill: “If a [differing] opinion is right, [leadership
and the membership will be] deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for
truth: if wrong, [leadership and the membership will] lose what is almost as
great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth,
produced by its collision with error” (On Liberty).
According
to author and activist Chris Hedges: “Unions, organizations formerly steeped
in the doctrine of class struggle and filled with those who sought broad social
and political rights for the working class, have been transformed into
domesticated partners of the capitalist class. They have been reduced to simple
bartering tools.” Of course, when we consider the CTU’s leadership, this
perception is wrong.
-
glen
No comments:
Post a Comment