Coming Attractions:
The Committee of Ten’s Procrustean Illogic
Procrustean: Adj. from the
noun Procrustes, a mythological and lawless bandit who terrorized the
countryside surrounding Athens, Greece, until he was defeated by the hero
Theseus. Procrustes had two very
different beds, one very short and one very long. Captured travelers were forced to lie upon a
bed. Those too short to fit were
stretched to death, and those too tall had their legs and feet cut off.
The
word Procrustean has therefore come
to describe a person’s imposing a conformity or reason without any real concern
for individuality or factuality.
You
will recall that Governor Quinn empaneled a group of ten legislators in July to
hammer out a hybrid plan for pension reform by the end of, well, the end of
July, now August, and soon September. In
hopes of increasing their sense of urgency, Quinn has withheld their pay until
a solution is presented.
Lately,
various members of the Committee of Ten appointed by Governor Quinn have been floating
teasers of a pending agreement on the “pension problem” in Illinois.
Committee
Chairperson Kwame Raoul remarked that there has been significant movement “from
where we were at the onset of this thing, which was absolute stalemate” (http://www.sj-r.com/editorials/x369946608/Our-Opinion-Public-deserves-more-information-from-pension-committee).
Senator
Bill Brady has described the working group as being in possession of “all the
answers” needed to craft an appropriate legislative response. Remember that six of the ten committee
members need to sign off on the compromise in order to send it to the
leadership of both houses of the General Assembly for consideration.
Very
soon now, we will likely witness committee members schmoozing on radio and
parading on TV with the compromise proposal intended to pass both House and
Senate in the fall veto session.
The
task of finding an answer to the state’s debt problem without seeking revenue
solutions – instead taking from promised benefits of future, current, and past
workers – will assure a litany of upcoming Procrustean explanations – as well
as a court challenge.
Leading
the way will be Representative Elaine Nekritz, the pension point person for
Speaker Madigan. You’ll remember that
Nekritz (with now-Senator Dan Biss) fashioned SB1, the proposed House Bill that
would have severely impacted the COLA’s, contribution levels, and eventual
earnings. The Senate said NO to
SB1.
Representative
Nekritz alluded to the committee’s notable positive movement the other day on
WBBM news radio when she considered, “We are all coming together in good faith, and negotiating,
and these negotiations are very delicate.
But this is the first time that all four caucuses have been at the
table, agreeing on anything with regard to the pension situation” (http://www.benefitspro.com/2013/08/21/progress-in-illinois-pension-reform-talks).
The
four caucuses represent the Democratic Senators, the Republican Senators, the Democratic
Representatives, and the Republican Representatives – not those coalitions of
workers who will be affected.
Good
faith does not necessarily include the coalitions of people to be impacted. They’ve had their say.
And
of course we can count on the Procrustean refrain that the committee has
cobbled this compromise in order to “save” our chance to have any pension at
all.
It
is a theme you can find in much of their illogic. Senator Brady suggested the other day that they
would “craft a proposal that
would be meaningful, constructive and would protect the interests of the people
who’ve paid into the pensions and the taxpayers.”
Good faith?
Remember,
they’re making your bed. Now you only
have to lie down in it.
“Any statute which [is] imposed upon individuals…in order to redistribute resources and, thus, benefit some persons at the expense of others would extend beyond the implicit boundaries of legislative authority. Such a law would, thus, violate natural rights of property and contract… [This is a] disguised form of robbery… [Moreover, enforcement of a contract between the State of Illinois and its public employees must be] guided by its constitutional language and history” (Tribe, Laurence H. American Constitutional Law).
ReplyDeleteAs retired teachers, we all knew that while we were in the hallway our totally silent classroom full of students was definitely a sign that they were up to no good.This is an extension of that scenario enacted by our silent Illinois legislators.
ReplyDeleteSince they all stand to benefit from the financial powers within the Civic Committee as well as the complicit corporate media, any form of fair treatment to active and retired teachers will be verboten.
-Ken
So where's Theseus?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete