An Invite from the Daily
Herald/Reboot Illinois (and a response)
Slusher: noun. One who promotes or
provides an excessive amount of sentiment.
From “slush” to describe films of over-the-top emotion in 1950’s
Hollywood.
Forum provides a chance for all views on pensions to grow.
By
Jim Slusher
(http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20130418/news/704189854/)
The Daily Herald has already stated unambiguously that we think
pension reform needs to be instituted immediately and we tend to favor — in
principle at least, if not in every detail — a compromise approach offered by
state Rep. Elaine Nekritz and Sen. Daniel Biss.
For the Daily Herald
to describe HB3411 as a compromise is the very definition of fallacious and distorted
reporting. Mr. Slusher would have people
believe it is compromise when one side determines to eliminate another side’s
benefits without a voice or a seat at the table - benefits promised constitutionally. Later on in the essay, you will read pathetic passage defending their bias; the
author will characterize the issues as very complicated. Not really for the Daily Herald. They don’t do complicated.
Might we, then, have an ulterior motive to promote a specific agenda
in sponsoring along with Reboot Illinois an information program on pension
reform proposals? It’s an understandable question. But the answer is an
unequivocal no. Our only objective for the Pension Forum scheduled for next
Wednesday night is to add depth and detail to the discussion over what to do
about the state’s pension crisis. That’s an interesting obfuscation,
especially given the spokesperson for Reboot Illinois is a past member of the
editorial staff if the Daily Herald. And
yet, spokespersons for the Reboot organization are trained, curried and
graduated into the Reboot organization. In fact, Mr. Lampinen (the moderator) considered Doubek not only a friend, but also a mentor...a colleague...a strategic advisor to corporate leadership...feedback I have always valued"(Doubek leaves Daily Herald for Reboot Illinois ‘mission’ - Time Out Chicago).
With that goal in mind, we and Reboot — a nonpartisan political reform
website that coincidentally has also supported the Biss-Nekritz agenda — seek
to create a program in which some of the leading ideas on the pension issue can
get a thorough review before a suburban audience. If you believe that Reboot is a non-partisan political
reform website, you are making a very strained and conscious effort to ignore
Reboot’s founders’ contributions to the Koch brothers and other organizations
that undermine workers unions across the United States. Nearly $2 million in contributions to the
Koch brothers in the past few years would make one wonder what Reboot’s
“non-partisan” agenda is really all about.
Of course, once the Koch’s have purchased the Chicago Tribune, we might
not expect any surprising revelations.
The continued attacks on public sectors workers will continue,
exponentially.
Reboot’s Chief Operating Officer
Madeleine Doubek secured commitments from state Reps. Nekritz, a Northbrook
Democrat, and Tom Morrison, a Palatine Republican, and Illinois Education
Association President Cinda Klickna to conduct a panel discussion that Doubek
and Daily Herald Political Editor Kerry Lester will moderate. By the way, Doubek is a past editor at the
DH. Let’s see – DH editor picked by Reboot
founder who gives millions to Koch bros. to lead new non-Partisan political
website? Laughable.
It’s important to point out that the three speakers espouse positions that differ substantially from each other. Among other things, Nekritz’ proposal would end the compounding of annual 3 percent cost-of-living increases for retirees, make other adjustments to benefits and gradually shift responsibility for making pension payments from the state to local agencies. Besides running head-on into constitutional conflict, Nekritz’s bill endorses a bill that makes those burglarized with the payment for Illinois’ debt burden. Some of the component parts appear whimsical; even in the face of the pain it will cause thousands of pension recipients. Case in point: In a recent email correspondence from Representative Cassidy’s handlers, there is absolutely no reason for the amount of $25,000 to be the base for determining the new concept of a simple COLA. In short, it is absolutely arbitrary. Maybe it just sounded good at the moment?
Morrison’s — co-sponsored by Wheaton Republican Jeanne Ives — would
move all new hires into a 401(k)-style savings program and freeze
cost-of-living increases, at least for now. These are two Tea Party right-wingers that would eliminate all
payments to workers that pave roads, teach children, provide health care, care
for the indigent, stop fires, provide emergency services, etc. By simply dropping the pensions, we can eliminate
all past debt, right? Nope – we still
owe the pensions $100 billion. But the Tea
Party loves simple without reflection, or legality, or consequence.
The IEA supports proposals that maintain a traditional pension
program, raise revenues by closing what they call corporate tax loopholes and
require increased contributions from employees.
That would be SB2404,
which is only the start of an attempt to find some balance between payment due
for the theft of billions of dollars of guaranteed benefits from public workers
and the need to provide services to current Illinois citizens.
We knew from the outset that public pensions are an important topic,
but we did not expect the complicated politics of the issue to attract as much
interest as they have. As a result, we’ve had to move to a larger venue and
still cap attendance and turn away some people. That process naturally stirs
fears some people may be shut out so that their point of view will not be
presented. To that concern, I can only say: We are an information company. We
have and express opinions sometimes, but our No. 1 objective, our No. 1 interest,
is to provide information, particularly information that will help our
democracy work better. Warning: The Daily Herald’s vision of “our”
will not necessarily be the same as yours, public sector worker.
So, if for whatever reason you cannot make next week’s forum, take
heart. We’ll be live streaming the program and finding other ways to involve
people in the discussion who may not be attending in person. Who knows? Our own
views about the legislative approaches under discussion may change. We know for
certain that they’ll grow. Whether you are a teacher worried about your future,
a citizen worried about your taxes or a school board member worried about your
budget, whether you attend in person, watch at dailyherald.com or just read about it all
later, we hope yours will, too. You betcha. Those good people at the Daily Herald and the
pipeline they work with called Reboot Illinois could possibly change their
minds and agree that public sector workers were ripped off, owed money, agreed
to make all their payments while the state did not, maintain a part of a middle class that
provides a huge econocmic boost to the economy in Illinois... and there are many
other means to correct a systemic state failure to secure revenue. BUT I DOUBT IT.
No comments:
Post a Comment