2018 – Noble Charter Schools CEO MILKIE TO RESIGN AFTER STUDENT PETITION OF 6,000 SIGNATURES
It was back on April 12, 2014, CEO Michael Milkie of Noble Street Charter Schools decided he would grace his students with a rescinding of the $5.00 fee for each infraction requiring detention. While that appeared a moment of humanistic charity, it was more likely the heat of exposure, General Assembly concerns, and bad press which caused Mr. Milkie to adopt this costume of largesse and caring.
Now, after protest by both students and parents, Noble Network Chairman Allan Muchin has announced that Michael Milkie will be gone by January of 2019. A copy of the petition can be found through an earlier
blogpost by Fred Klonsky.
Below, you will find a piece written nearly six years ago warning our readers in the “blogosphere” want was really going on in Charter-World, especially when it comes to pulling in profits for a CEO like Milkie.
From 2012. (HT:FK)
"If you don’t like it – you can leave.” - (a description of CEO Milkie’s and Mayor Emanuel’s response to questions regarding discipline policies at Noble Street Network School) – Jasmine Sarmiento, Voices of Youth in Chicago Educations.
“Noble is forcing low-income parents to choose between paying the rent and keeping their child in school. This is a tax on Chicago’s Black and Latino families, and it’s wrong..” - Donna Moore, parent of a student in Noble Network Schools.
Charter School Discipline (…or...How to take out the trash, and look real good)
Back in the day, I mean way back in the day, students actually got to determine their own form of discipline – a long piece of green hickory branch usually cut by the very student about to be switched. This was considered a vast improvement in exchange for the cane used during the 17thand 18thcenturies. Ah, progress.
After the mid-nineteenth century, continued disciplinary progress for public students included the paddle, in my own case, hung in plain sight above the principal’s office desk as a reminder of his overt ability to dispense justice in the form of extreme pain. But I was just one of many south side kids being “taught” and civilized in a continuing grand experiment on a national level.
Before all of us, even unto the mid 1850’s, education in America was provided primarily to the wealthy, and the overriding sentiment was that the poor were both uneducable and unworthy any attempts at education. It wasn’t until 1852 that Horace Mann, then Secretary of State for Massachusetts, urged all states to provide education to allstudents, creating what he hoped would be the great equalizer and the ultimate disappearance of poverty.
Later, the efforts of modernists like Phillipp Emanuel von Fellenberg and Francis Parker (1850’s) promoted concepts that remain current: “modern behavioral modification methods should attempt to address the underlying reasons or motivations for student misbehavior and tailor consequences to fit the (particular) transgression. School administrators should seek to encourage a positive association with school along with socially acceptable behavior” (
www.pbs.org/kcet/publicschool/evolving_classroom/discipline.html). In essence, these movements suggested that learning was best accomplished with support, encouragement and kindness. This was quite the opposite of discipline for being incorrect in answer or deportment. Remember that word,
deportment.
In the early 1900’s, as schooling became mandatory for all American youngsters, teachers found themselves stepping further and further into the roles of parents (
in loco parentis), and “one value attached to this development asserted that while adults should be punished for their crimes, children should be rehabilitated for theirs, thus formalizing a beginning to the separation between juvenile misconduct and suffering as its remedy” (
www.public.findlaw.com/education/school_discipline_history.html) . I’m often sorry my own principal had not harkened to these findings…but I digress.
Augmenting these modifications of the kinds of discipline painfully dished out in the working houses and boarding schools of the past, the 20thcentury educator awakened to the concept that education was more than simply transfer; instead, with the assistance of forward thinkers like Rosenblatt, Berne, Spock, etc., psycho-social arguments promoted the student’s own involvement in a transactional paradigm of learning. In short, teachers and educators moved way from the traditional belief that students learn best by rote and by sitting demurely in linear rows at rigid attention; quite the opposite, best practice now held to a more personalized and interactive learning/teaching construct.
Introducing NOBLE STREET.
The Noble Network of Charter Schools, which runs 10 city high schools and yearns for more after recent school closings, has found an entirely new, novel method of exacting discipline for student “misbehavior.” This is the same network of schools that Mayor Rahm Emanuel praised for having the “secret sauce” for improving students’ scores, behavior, and success rates. It would appear that the secret sauce of which the Mayor and Superintendent Brizard crow is in great part actually a monetary disciplinary fee that has raised nearly $400,000 this year for Noble Street, left parents foundering to scrape together fines that are imposed upon them for their own student’s deportment, and has caused the flight of nearly 13% of students from the Noble Street charter schools back into the public system from whence they came – seeking opportunity and assistance to improve their own lots in life and finding failure for disciplinarily high expectations – monetarily?
In fact, according to the Chicago Tribune (Ahmed-Ullah, Noreen. Protests targets charter discipline fees. Chicago Tribune. 14 Feb. 2012), the loss of students from the Noble Network schools to other public districts has increased from 211 students in 2010 to 473 students in 2011. At the same time, CEO Michael Milkie will point glowingly at the Noble Networks improved graduation rates, not surprisingly – from 78.8% in 2010 to 86.2% in 2011. And CEO Mr. Milkie, who earns an annual salary over $200,000, should be proud of his enterprise’s increased revenue stream. Noble Street has received almost $400,000 in disciplinary fees since the 2008-2009 school year (Ahmed-Ullah). George M. Schmidt of
Substance Newsreports “the charter company is profiting to the tune of some $200,000 per year from a disciplinary code that can only be called predatory” (
www.substancenews.net/articles.php?page=3055).
Following the kind of schema found in the factory/transference models of business and schools of the early 1900’s, Noble Street has implemented the “SMART” disciplinary code. Here is what SMART’s acronym entails:
S = Sit up straight and be ready to learn.
M= Make eye contact when addressed.
A= Articulate in standard English and speak in proper volume.
R= Respond appropriately.
T= Track the speaker.
Each of these misdemeanors comes with a fine of $5 or more. In fact, infractions include an unbelievably long list of potential infractions not necessarily spelled out – chewing gum, carrying “chips,” forgetting your belt, tardiness, carrying a marking pen, having an energy drink, making a noise with a pen, etc. Each infraction (and others) will cost a student $5.00 or more (Rossi, Rosalind. School’s discipline: you act up you pay up. Chicago Sun Times. 14 Feb. 2012).
By the way, if a student is having a bad day – or time of it – 12 detentions/infractions or more will result in a $140 fine (they call it a fee) to attend an obligatory class on “behavior.” Additional detentions will result in an additional discipline class for an additional $140. Any student (more likely their family) who cannot pay will be held back from moving on to the next class – regardless of his or her grades. Please keep in mind that even though Noble Street schools are funded by wealthy benefactors like Penny Pritzker, nearly 90% of the families are low-income (Schmidt, George), and cannot afford the mounting fees for students who are having difficulty adapting to the “SMART” model.
Unlike the public system, Noble is allowed tougher disciplinary policies than the CPU because it is a charter – remember our earlier changing characterizations of public vs. private when it came to our model Chicago Math and Science Academy (see Vocabulary – Feb 19 & 26). Meanwhile, CEO Mr. Milkie affirms that SMART and the other “disciplinary policies at NOBLE promote basic, common sense citizenship things, which you know teenagers need” (Golab, Art.
www.substancenews.net/articles.php?page=3055)
On the national level, school chief Arne Duncan also touts Milkie’s Noble Street agenda and, along with Pritzkers and other wealthy benefactors, endorses the programs used there: “’ We’re dramatically changing the opportunity structure,’ Duncan told Chicagoa few weeks before leaving his CPS post to become the U.S. secretary of education. ‘We have tried to make this [city] a mecca for people who want to make change in public education ‘” (Rodkin, Dennis. Charting a new course. Chicago Magazine.com. 29 Feb. 2012).
